Fix #364 Introduce cleanup() function for SSE to be called from loop()#370
Closed
mathieucarbou wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
Fix #364 Introduce cleanup() function for SSE to be called from loop()#370mathieucarbou wants to merge 1 commit into
mathieucarbou wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
5 tasks
5 tasks
6fe83a0 to
edc75e4
Compare
ddd28c1 to
f54fa69
Compare
5 tasks
This function is similar to `cleanupClients(N)` for WebSocket except that it only cleanups internal resources. This "book-keeping" function has to be called in the loop(). This is a non-elegant attempt to fix issue #364
460e2af to
9203c47
Compare
Member
Author
|
not necessary anymore |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fix #364 Introduce cleanup() function
This function is similar to
cleanupClients(N)for WebSocket except that it only cleanups internal resources.This "book-keeping" function has to be called in the loop().
This is a non-elegant attempt to fix issue #364